Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  16 / 322 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 16 / 322 Next Page
Page Background

HOWARD UNIVERSITY.

3

TH E FOUND ING O F HOW ARD U N IV E R ­

S IT Y , W A SH IN G TO N , D. C.

The history of the foundation of the

Howard University has been written a

number of times. The best histories are

the following: One by Wm. W. Patton,

D. D., LL. D., who was President of the

University from 1877 to 1890; it was

printed at the Industrial Department of

the University in 1896. The other con­

sists of three papers which were read at

the twenty-fifth anniversary of the foun­

dation, March 2, 1892. Of these three

papers one was by Rev. Danforth B.

Nichols, A. M., M. D , and entitled " The

Genesis of Howard University” ; another

by J. Eames Rankin, D. D., LL. D., who

succeeded Patton as President; it was en­

titled " The Presidents of Howard Univer­

sity” . The third was by James B. John­

son, A. M., for many years Secretary and

Treasurer of the University. These three

papers were printed together in 1895 by

the University press. In view of these

publications it is unnecessary in the pre­

sent work to which I have been invited

to contribute to give more than a short

paper on this subject, or to do other than

make a very brief statement for the in­

formation of those to whom the histories

mentioned are not accessible.

The following incidents immediately

preceded and led up to the establishment

of the University. On the evening of

November 17, 1866, at the monthly con­

cert of the First Congregational Church

of Washington, held at Columbia Law

Building, opposite Judiciary Square, this

being one of the meeting places of the

congregation, a prominent topic was the

evangelization of the freedmen. On the

20th, eleven members assembled at the

residence of Mr. Henry A. Brewster,

where the question was further considered,

and a committee of three was appointed,

consisting of the pastor of the church,

Rev. Dr. Boynton, Rev. B. F. Morris and

Rev. D. B. Nichols, to prepare and report

a plan in detail. The committee reported

on December 4, recommending the open­

ing of a night school in which instruc­

tion should be given in the evidences of

Christianity, biblical interpretation, bibli­

cal history and geography, and anatomy

and physiology in their relation to hy­

giene. This was perhaps the first time

that physiology and anatomy were made

a part of the curriculum of a theological

school; the suggestion came from Dr.

Silas L. Loomis. The school was to be

called Howard Theological Seminary, and

three instructors were appointed without

salary, Rev. E. W. Robinson, Rev. D. B.

Nichols and Dr. Silas L. Loomis. The

object was stated to be : “ The Educa­

tion of Colored Youth for the Ministry” .

Senators Samuel C. Pomeroy of Kansas,

and Henry Wilson of Massachusetts were

present at the meeting. At the sugges­

tion of Senator Pomeroy, the scope of the

school was enlarged to include the pre­

paration of teachers as well as ministers,

and its name changed to " Theological

and Normal Institute” . A committee

consisting of Senators Pomeroy and Wil­

son and Hon. Burton C. Cooke, member

of the House of Representatives, was ap­

pointed to procure a charter from Congress.

The first form of the charter was drawn

by Senator Pomeroy.

Afterward, at a

subsequent meeting, at Mr. Pomeroy’s

suggestion the Board decided to open the

doors of the Institution to both sexes and

all races. It was also voted, at my sug­

gestion, in time for the charter, to estab­

lish a University which should include,

besides the theological and normal de­

partments first thought of, a department

of law, another of medicine, and one of

agriculture ; also a preparatory and colle­

giate department or departments.

On

January 8, 1867, on motion of Rev. D. B.

Nichols, a vote was taken to call the

new Institution “ Howard University,” in

honor of myself and the part I had born

in its inception and primary development.

This was done against my sincere protest.

I thought I could do more for the Institu­

tion under any other name.

At another meeting, held January 29

of the same year, some changes in the bill

which had not yet become a law were

suggested by myself, and a committee was

appointed, consisting of Dr. Boynton, Sen­

ator Wilson and myself, as chairman, to

revise the bill for incorporation which

had already been introduced in both

houses of Congress.

That bill as revised passed both houses