Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  163 / 322 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 163 / 322 Next Page
Page Background

HOWARD UN IVERSITY.

141

G R A D U A T E S .

A printed explanatory circular [Appen­

dix C], dated July 31, 1899, accompanied

by a return information blank [Appendix

D] >was sent to every graduate and non-

eraduate student whose address was ob-

tained. Where reply was not received

in a reasonable time, another similar cir­

cular and blank were sent. A second

circular, dated March i, 1900 [Appendix

E ] , accompanied by a subscription card,

was also sent to all known addresses.

Some persons have deferred or neg­

lected to reply, but so far as known to

the editor, only one person has refused to

receive the communications sent to him.

It is deserving of mention, as showing

carelessness on the part of the Post-Office

v. /

dentists and pharmacists, college cata­

logues,

Blue Books

, and other printed pub­

lications, has been edited into suitable

form and appears

infra

. Mention should

again be made of the fact that the Ex­

ecutive Committee records up to 1874, and

Faculty minutes from February 27, 1878

to March 1, 1886, have not been found.

There has been some difficulty in hand­

ling satisfactorily the information re­

ceived. In a few cases the spelling of

the surname has been changed; for in­

stance, the addition or omission of a final

e.

Different statements have been made

by the same individual in regard to date

and place of birth— differing in days of

the month, months of the year, and even

in the years, and sometimes in places

many miles apart. The credibility, how­

ever, of these persons 011 the witness

stand would not be questioned, and the

explanation seems to be nothing else

than carelessness.

The editor is

compelled to believe that if

the usual preliminary ques­

tion to the witness, u How

old are you ? ” were changed

to u When and where were

you born?” a surprising

amount of sudden ignorance

and doubt would be ex­

Department or correspondents, or both,

that in about 400 replies to the second

circular, it was stated that the first had

not been received. The accompanying

illustration is an evidence of the risks of

correspondence from fire, flood and rail­

road wrecks.

The information contained in blanks re­

ceived back, and in biographical sketches

received, supplemented by that found in

the records of the Trustees, Executive

Committee and Medical Faculty of the

University, and in registers of physicians,

hibited.

Where the individual has stated that

he was married, the fact has been in­

cluded in the sketch ; but where he

was unmarried or made no mention of

the marital relation, the subject has been

omitted from the sketch. In a few cases

the response to the question, “ Married

or unmarried,” has been

No,

in a few

others,

Yes;

instances of careless corres­

pondence.

Fifty-two graduates had the degree of

A. B .; 26 that of A. M. ; 10 of EE- B. ;